Online Music Distribution Australia


American Society of Composers, Artists and Performers, stands proud that it "protects the rights of its members by licensing and distributing royalties for the non-dramatic public performances of their copyrighted works" as stated on their web site. However, over the last year or so, many news stories have been released about ASCAP's aggression against everyone from cell phone companies to iTunes to small web sites. These increased aggressions place the musicians in a dangerous position where, rather than embracing technologies changes to further their sales, the artists may be losing their market share by silencing the technology that would promote them.
ASCAP's first target in their campaign against technology was the cell phone industry, citing the use of songs as ringtones as a public performance of an artist's songs. As a result, ASCAP believed they qualified for a cut in the sale of every ringtone. Please note, the cell phone companies are already paying a licensing fee for using the songs, however, ASCAP believes a further payment should be made because the ringtone is a "public performance." The case was eventually thrown out by a judge who ruled that no public performance was involved in a cell phone ringing.
While the judge may have ruled in favor of the cell phone companies, it begs the question, what was ASCAP's goal? People don't opt to listen to a thirty-second clip of a song instead of purchasing it, instead, the 30 seconds might serve as a tease that will pique a listener's interest and lead them to go purchase the song the next time they are at their computer. What's more, the cell phone companies already pay licensing for the songs, so profits are already being generated for the music industry when users purchase songs. As such, it seems ASCAP's only possible goal here was to stifle the promotion of their artists by stopping people from playing their artists 30 second clips, or at least requiring that they be paid more for the clips (which would likely get pushed off to the consumers, increasing the cost of these artists songs and thus, decreasing their sales/promotion).
ASCAP's fear of thirty second promotions and essentially free advertising does not stop with the cell phone companies, as they extended their attacks to digital music stores like iTunes and Amazon. ASCAP feels that the thirty second previews offered on Amazon, iTunes, and similar online music stores, qualifies as a public performance and so, demands that these services pay an additional fee to cover this usage. Once again, it is important to note that these services already pay for distribution of the music, ASCAP just wants further money for the "public performance" aspect of the service.
The question resurfaces, why? ASCAP in effect is asking Amazon and iTunes to pay for the right to advertise ASCAP's artists as these thirty second previews are offered as a way to get people to purchase more of an artist's music, not less of it. If iTunes and Amazon were forced into such an agreement with ASCAP, it is likely that they would just remove this feature from artists under ASCAP's wing, opening more opportunities for artists not under the ASCAP banner. The only people who would be hurt by this deal would be the artists themselves, who would lose sales to fans who want to preview a song before blindly purchasing on these digital music services.
In their continued crusade to silence the music, ASCAP shifted their focus to YouTube and similar media outlets. With strong justifications (Yahoo, YouTube and others are profiting from these videos after all), ASCAP sued the various digital video distributors and won settlements and monthly contracts for the performance of videos on these networks.
However, in a similar vein to their attacks on digital music distributors and cell phone companies, ASCAP decided to push its demands too far and again, is forming a noose around the artists they claim to protect. ASCAP has decided not only to sue the digital video distributors, but to also send letters of demand to sites embedding videos from these services. Now, any web site that embeds videos from YouTube that feature ASCAP artists will be served a letter demanding the site pays ASCAP for their usage.
This seems fair, until you recall that ASCAP is already being paid for each of these views by the digital video services. In effect, ASCAP is double dipping, attempting to be paid for every view by both the digital video service and by the web sites that are sharing these videos.
Why is this cause for concern? Again, ASCAP is trying to sever promotion of its artists, and even reduce the amount of views its videos will receive, thereby reducing the overall amount of money they could be paid by these digital video services. As a web distributor, when faced with the possible burden of paying licensing fees for using YouTube, would you continue to promote and embed those videos, or would you find artists outside of ASCAP's domain and promote them instead?
The new digital age and the Internet have made it possible for people like me, my friend, and most of all you, a chance to release our own music worldwide independently. Best of all it has made it possible to release your own music without actually being signed to a record label. Only until recently I never released how this was even possible. My friend didn't even realize how this was even possible. We can now use online music distributors to release our music and cut out all the middlemen. There are many music distributors available on the internet that are all very good to use, many of which will work in a different principle on how they take their cut from your music releases. Some of these music distributors will just take a one off yearly payment and charge you a fee per song you upload for release, whilst others may want a 15-20% share from every release sold online through them as well as a small distribution cost from every release depending on how many download stores you want to distribute your song to. Many of these distributors offer good customer service, as well as the necessary ISRC codes that will identify your song and make it chart eligible. Most of these distributors even have online software in which you release your songs with, along with online tutorial videos on how to release your music with the software to make the process much easier such as music distributor Rebeat for example.
My favorite distributors are a German based distribution company called Feiyr. I mainly use them for my record label releases as they have great software imbedded into their online website which makes it great for releasing tracks for my record label. They also have a large list of digital distribution stores that they use to distribute your music too, as well as a large popular amount of record labels using their services.
If your thinking of starting a record label then it is not easy I'll be honest. I never imagined it being easy either and as frustrating as it has been for me, I haven't given up either. It could have been a lot easier if there were more information that I managed to find available online, but I never found it unfortunately. It has been one big trial and error mission for me, but the mistakes pay off in the long run. Any articles I found on the subject were never continued or about a page long. The best way that I found to learn was to just chuck myself into the deep end and get on with it. As soon as you start using your first Music distributor to release your music and see your first release, everything will start to fit into place nicely. If you can use a computer and are familiar with the Internet which I'm sure you are, then you have no excuses not to get started now. It seems that perseverance is your best friend, so please remember that and don't give up. Once you hit that brick wall you must keep going. Countless times we have all felt like throwing in the towel and giving up, but remember that's just the easy way out, that's because it's true! If you have read this far then you will be as determined, if not more determined than me with a fire in your heart to succeed. You want to start a record label or you want to release your own music. You want to test the waters with yours and others music and there is no better opportunity than to start today. You at least owe it to yourself! Today's digital age and the Internet have made it possible for you to do just that, so no more excuses!
Music has not lost its inherent character ever since the times of prehistoric percussion, but recording media is becoming more and more intangible. MP3 is gradually replacing the CD, record stores are disappearing and giving way to web shops, and search engines are now taking the place of the guy at the record store who used to tell you where to find the record you were looking for and also told you who was hot or not. Even though it's not the case yet, soon iTunes, Napster and Amazon will surely sell more music than physical stores; and they have a great advantage over "real" shops: there's no need for a warehouse anymore, the stock stays on a server and it can be replicated endlessly.
These developments affect the key players in the music industry and the role they have in the process of marketing an album. Until now, once the record was mixed and mastered, the artist depended on the financial support of a label to replicate a great number of copies and to dispatch them to the dealers. Both of these tasks are on their way to disappearing thanks to online music sales and service providers like Zimbalam.
Zimbalam.com is the "mass market" version of Believe Digital, a record label with its own artist roster and, at the same time, a special service provider helping traditional labels bring their catalog online. The idea behind Zimbalam is very simple: they put your songs in 20 online shops in 240 countries for a fixed rate under a non-exclusive distribution agreement. Having your demo on Napster, Amazon and iTunes is now possible for only £19.99 (two tracks) or £29.99 (three or more tracks).
One of the best surprises Zimbalam has to offer is that you get 90% of the royalties generated from the retail price, which means real money in the bank for each sale. If you sell two songs at £1.49 each, at the end of that quarter you'll get around £2.20 from the sale. You can also claim back an additional percentage of the sale as a song-writer's royalty through the PRS, to further increase you revenues. Excellent royalties, absurdly low prices and a non-exclusive agreement? It seems too good to be true. That's why we went to Believe Digital's offices in Paris (France) to learn more about Zimbalam and to test their services. We met Denis Ladegaillerie, a skilled lawyer who has worked for Universal Music US, eMusic, MP3.com, Rollingstone.com, and is co-founder and CEO of Believe Digital.
You first need to understand that this is business and not hustling. When you want to start making real profit from your music you need to look at it differently. Selling your mixtapes on the street is not the same as selling them online. Be prepared to start making business moves and making a future for yourself.
You need to learn some good business principles to stay making money online. Make sure you have enough songs to sell before starting. Collect around 100 of your best songs that you want to sell and name them properly. Right now the trend is to sell singles for $.99 each and albums for around $9.99 each.
Make organized folders for your songs and albums with categories to keep everything from being mixed up. You will soon find out why this is important. You can break your categories down into styles, genres and tempos.
Go on iTunes and look at the people are selling the most singles. Study how they price their music and apply it to your songs. You don't want to copy everything that they are doing, but make sure you understand what is popular right now. This will help you fit right in and create your own market.
Keep your prices all the same. Charging different prices will make it seem that one track is hotter than the other one. Having one set price will show that they are all hot songs. Distribute Your Music Worldwide. Our network of channels can distribute your music across the globe. Distribute music to Apple Music, iTunes, Spotify, Amazon Music, Google Play, and Deezer.

Comments